Wednesday, June 10, 2015

Sermon for Pentecost 2 (Proper 5B), June 7, 2015


            Beloved in Christ, for quite some time now Christians have presented a rather tame picture of Jesus. In the last century or two artists and theologians alike tend to portray Him as soft and gentle. There is no manly ferocity about Him, nor even an intensity of soul. He is presented as almost a nothing, someone who can be fashioned into whatever you want to believe or think about Him, but certainly no one who would ever shake up your world or your worldview. But as the Anglican theologian N.T. Wright has observed, there is nothing in these portrayals of Jesus that would explain how He ended up on a cross. A Mr. Milquetoast may be an altogether pleasant individual, but a Mr. Milquetoast never gets crucified, either.

            Now I am not saying that Jesus behaved like a marauding barbarian. His ferocity and intensity did not show itself in violence and butchery—and neither should ours. But He intended to shake up society as much as Attila the Hun would. Indeed, Attila came and went, and whatever havoc he caused soon diminished after his passing. But our Lord’s kingdom continues to endure twenty centuries after our Lord began His ministry.

            The early Christians understood this. Mark, in particular, grasped this truth. Of all the gospel writers he is the most forthright about describing Christ’s stunning power as well as the opposition it evoked. And we see that in today’s gospel. On the one hand, Jesus was so incredibly popular that crowds were trying to get near Him, leaving no time for them or Him to grab a bite to eat. On the other hand, his own family thought that he was crazy, while the learned religious teachers thought that he was downright demonic. The one thing you didn’t hear people say about Him was that He was just okay.

            Jesus was either demonic, crazy, or the incarnate Son of God. Some of you have heard of C.S. Lewis’ threefold dilemma: Since Christ claimed to be the Son of God, either He was a liar, a lunatic, or the Lord. As Lewis explained, either Christ was the Son of God or He wasn’t. If He wasn’t the Son of God, He either knew that He wasn’t or He was deluded into thinking that He was. If He knew that He wasn’t, He would have been a liar. If He was deluded, He would have been a lunatic. But if He was telling the truth, He must be Lord. Note that there is no option of merely “Good Teacher” among the possibilities.

            Mark in effect sets up the same dilemma, but he sharpens it. He doesn’t merely say that Christ would be a liar if He knew that He wasn’t the Son of God. No, He would actually have had to have been demonic, for even His enemies knew that He did supernatural things. Far from being a good teacher, He would have had to have been the devil incarnate if He tried to pass on such a horrible deception that He was the Son of God when He wasn’t. And so Lewis may have spoken of the choices being liar, lunatic, or Lord, but Mark sets forth the choices as demonic, crazy, or Lord.

            Well, how do we evaluate these choices? Today’s gospel gives the “crazy” option rather short shrift. If Jesus were that crazy, He wouldn’t have drawn such large crowds as He did. If you seriously think that He was crazy, we can talk about that after the service or in a future sermon. But let us look instead at what interests Mark the most: the accusation that Jesus was demonic and advancing His kingdom by using satanic powers. The accusation takes seriously—as it should—that there is a spiritual realm beyond the merely physical and that not everything in that spiritual realm is good. Both Jesus and His opponents would have agreed on those premises. Many people today would not, and that shows how spiritually impoverished our society is. No society can be truly spiritual if it denies the spiritual realm altogether or equally if it naively assumes that everything spiritual is good, as the “spiritual but not religious” crowd tends to believe today.

            Well, what would have aroused suspicion among Jesus’ opponents? After all, so far in Mark’s gospel Jesus had cast out demons and healed many people. Those are good things, and we might expect that they would confirm Jesus to be a truly spiritual man. But He did a couple other things that rankled some people. First, He forgave the sins of a paralyzed man. Had Jesus just healed him, nobody would have had any problem. But the way He set it up implied that His ability to heal proved His ability to forgive sins. Second, He proclaimed Himself “Lord of the Sabbath” and healed on the Sabbath and defended His disciples who had plucked grain on a Sabbath and nibbled on it on the way. In so doing He was trumping Moses and setting Himself up as someone greater than Moses.

            These incidents get at the heart of why people hated Jesus back then and why they hate Him now. He doesn’t proclaim Himself a mere guru or wise teacher. He proclaims Himself Lord of creation, including Lord of the Sabbath. But the real sticking point is that He comes bringing the forgiveness of sins. If He were to stick merely to helping people improve themselves, then everyone would accept Him. But He says that He can forgive sins and wipe the slate clean. For us that naturally seems as diabolical as diabolical can be—the inverse of real spirituality. For there are two truths that we hold self-evident: we are not sinners and, even if we have done some bad things, we can get to a point in our life where God will have to accept us for all the good that we have done. Either way, sin is not a problem that needs to involve Jesus’ meddling.

            Thus, either we or Jesus are diabolical liars. Either He is devilish for interfering in the natural process whereby we do enough good works to earn favor with God, or we are devilishly deceived in thinking that our works are good enough to please God. Well, which is the case? You might consider the comments you made this past week about other people and consider whether or not others might make similar comments about you. Just as you felt justified in your criticism of others, they would be equally justified in their thoughts about you. Now if this is what other people think of you, even though they cannot examine your thoughts and impulses and desires, how do you think you will fare before Almighty God, to whom all thoughts are known?

            No, Jesus is not the diabolical one. We are. We are the people who have taken our bad deeds and tried to pass them off as heroic virtues. We are the people who want to take our sweaty stink and call it perfume. And so when Jesus sets Himself before us as our Savior, we had better take Him seriously, for our hope does not lie in ourselves.

            Our Lord invites us to see that He is doing something breathtaking. He intends to do nothing short of overthrowing Satan and the whole demonic realm. He began casting out demons, but He didn’t stop there. He stopped our demonic habit of trying to justify ourselves. Let’s face it. We’ve been doing that ever since the fall into sin in the Garden of Eden. We pointed fingers at others and said, “They are the problem. They are the reason for any sin in my life. They are to blame, not I.” But Jesus stopped that blame game by Himself taking our blame. He carried that guilt all the way to the cross, where He died. He allowed Satan to bruise His heel so that He in turn could crush Satan’s head.

            Therefore, now the truly crazy and demonic thing to do would be to oppose our Lord Jesus Christ. That is why our Lord warned us against interfering with the Holy Spirit’s work in such a way as to blaspheme the Holy Spirit. Our Lord didn’t mind being called all sorts of nasty names. That came with the job, as far as He was concerned, for He would be called many things on route to the cross to atone for the world’s sins. And so He let those insults roll off of Him. But He didn’t and doesn’t want us to call the work of the Holy Spirit satanic. The Holy Spirit calls us to repent of our sins and to trust in Christ. If we call that work of the Holy Spirit “demonic,” it will cut us off from the one path that leads to eternal life.

            It isn’t that badmouthing the Holy Spirit is worse than badmouthing Jesus or God the Father. What Jesus is talking about here is resisting the Holy Spirit tugging at our hearts, convincing us of the truth about Christ, and leading us to repentance. If we persistently and consistently to our death resist the Holy Spirit’s prompting, then all is lost, for we will have cut ourselves off from the only person who could have helped us.


            Instead, our Lord invites us to look more carefully at Him. He is not a tame Jesus, but the one who has tied up Satan and proceeded to plunder all his treasures, which by the way would include us, who had been his captives. Therefore, Christianity is not a tame religion, nor are Christians tame people. Again, as I said earlier, we do not behave like barbarians. When Jesus spoke of tying up Satan and plundering his house, He wasn’t saying that He would act like a common criminal. Instead, He was saying that His kind but firm and persistent actions would have that devastating effect on Satan's dominion. In the same way, we persistently and intensely follow our Lord. We are like the crowd that can’t get enough of Jesus, but who hang on His every word. And, thus, we are also His brothers, sisters, and mother, as dear to Him as He is to us. In Jesus’ name. Amen.

No comments:

Post a Comment